Group Member Prototypicality and Intergroup Negotiation: How One’s Standing in the Group Affects Negotiation Behavior

Gerben A. van Kleef
University of Amsterdam – Department of Psychology

Wolfgang Steinel
Leiden University – Social and Organizational Psychology

D.L. van Knippenberg
Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR)

Michael A. Hogg
Claremont Colleges – Claremont Graduate University

Alicia Svensson
University of Queensland

June 15, 2004

IACM 17th Annual Conference Paper


How does a representative’s position in the group influence behavior in intergroup negotiation? Applying insights from social identity theory, the effects of group member prototypicality, process accountability, and group attractiveness on competitiveness in intergroup bargaining were investigated. As representatives of their group, participants engaged in a computer-mediated negotiation with a simulated outgroup opponent. In Exp. 1, representatives with a peripheral status in the group sent more competitive and fewer cooperative messages to the opponent than did prototypical representatives, but only under process accountability. Exp. 2 replicated this finding, and showed that, under accountability, peripherals also made higher demands than did prototypicals, but only when group membership was perceived as attractive. Implications for intergroup negotiation, group member prototypicality research, and impression management are discussed.

Group Member Prototypicality and Intergroup Negotiation- How One’s Standing in the Group Affects Negotiation Behavior

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Tu dirección de correo no será publicada.


Google Analytics