David H. Clark
Binghamton University
William Reed
University of Maryland
Timothy Nordstrom
University of Mississippi
Daniel J Siegel
Independent
2014
APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper
Abstract:
Bargaining models of war point to two major causes of conflict: asymmetric information, and commitment problems. This paper focuses on the commitment problem, and specifically on how responsive bargainers are to expected changes in win probabilities.
Our goal is to evaluate whether bargainers can identify commitment problems – in lab experiments, we examine subjects’ choices between bargaining and fighting, given shifts in win probabilities and costs.
Commitment Problems and Bargaining Failure- Experimental Evidence
Leave a Reply