Claiming a Large Slice of a Small Pie: Asymmetric Disconfirmation in Negotiation

Richard P. Larrick

Duke University – Fuqua School of Business

George Wu

University of Chicago – Booth School of Business

December 2005

Abstract:

Three studies show that negotiators consistently underestimate the size of the bargaining zone in distributive negotiations (the small pie bias) and, by implication, overestimate the share of the surplus they claim (the large slice bias). We explain the results by asymmetric disconfirmation: Negotiators with initial estimates of their counterpart’s reservation price that are «inside» the bargaining zone tend to behave consistently with these estimates, which become self-fulfilling, whereas negotiators with initial «outside» estimates revise their perceptions in the face of strong disconfirming evidence. Asymmetric disconfirmation can produce a population-level bias even when initial perceptions are accurate on average. We suggest that asymmetric disconfirmation has implications for confirmation bias and self-fulfilling prophecy research in social perception.

Claiming a Large Slice of a Small Pie- Asymmetric Disconfirmation in Negotiation

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Tu dirección de correo no será publicada.


*


Google Analytics